Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01302
Original file (PD2012 01302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xx         CASE: PD1201302
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS  BOARD DATE: 20130613
SEPARATION DATE: 20020215


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty, LCPL/E-3, (6541/Aviation Ordinance) medically separated for a left ankle condition. She was injured in 2001 and a review of health records revealed a history of left ankle fibular stress fracture. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The left ankle condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “recurrent stress fracture lateral malleolus,” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I was initially injured during my basic training. My injury has been described by an MD as chronic, meaning lifelong. I did my best to continue with my training and serve as a Aviation Ordinance Systems Technician despite being recommended by professionals in the medical Field ??? two(2) PEB boards. The impact of my initial injury has cost me the ability to due many weight bearing activities, including even standing or walking at times. This is also affected by a secondary injury in my hip flexor I received as a result of my chronic fibular stress fracture.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left ankle condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20120626
 VA - (15 days Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Recurrent Stress Fracture Lateral Malleolus
 5262 10% Status Post Left Malleolus and Fibular Fractures 5299-5262 10% 20020130
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 3 20020130
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20020416 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application regarding the significant impairment with which her service-incurred condition continues to burden her. The Board wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for service disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The Board further acknowledges the CI’s contention for ratings for other conditions documented at the time of separation, and notes that its recommendations in that regard must comply with the same governance.

Left Ankle Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a history of left ankle fibular stress fracture while in boot camp. The symptoms improved gradually with treatment and the CI was able to increase her activity, but the pain recurred with running and progressively worsened. X-ray of the left ankle showed a healed stress fracture of the lower fibula. At the last treatment visit noted in the record on 30 June 2001, approximately 8 months prior to separation, the CI reported a dull achy pain in the left ankle increased by prolonged standing or activity with occasional swelling. The exam showed ankle ROM that was decreased, but equal bilaterally, of dorsiflexion (DF) 10 degrees and plantar flexion (PF) 30 degrees. There was no tenderness to palpation (TTP), crepitus, effusion, or instability. Strength, sensation, and reflexes were normal. A repeat bone scan was noted as “increased uptake medial and lateral malleolus.” The assessment was medial and lateral malleolus stress fractures. The CI was to be non-weight bearing on the left ankle for a month.

At the MEB examination 2 August 2001, approximately 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported recurrent pain with weight bearing and was noted to be on crutches. The MEB physical examination noted no swelling or TTP of the left ankle. There was no instability and strength was normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) was DF of 15 degrees (normal 20°) and PF of 45 degrees (normal 45 degrees).

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination 30 January 2002, approximately 2 weeks prior to separation, the CI reported pain, swelling, stiffness and instability of the left ankle. The symptoms occurred intermittently and could last 1 or 2 days brought on by overuse, causing difficulty standing or walking for prolonged periods. She was not taking any medication for her ankle symptoms. The VA examination showed a normal gait. There was no swelling, effusion, instability, abnormal movement or weakness of the left ankle. ROM was DF of 15 degrees with pain; PF of 40 degrees with pain. Strength, sensation and reflexes were normal bilaterally. The examiner noted the major functional impact for the veteran was painful limited left ankle ROM.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the left ankle condition as 5262 (tibia and fibula impairment) at 10%. The VA also rated the left ankle condition at 10%, coded as 5299-5262 (analogous to tibia and fibular impairment). The Board deliberated the rating of the left ankle condition. The Board noted that despite appropriate medical treatment the CI had persistent slightly decreased, painful ROM of the left ankle. The Board agreed that this met the 10% disability rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (Painful motion) coded as 5262. The Board reviewed to see if there was a path to a higher evaluation than the 10% disability rating adjudicated by the PEB and concluded that there was not. Therefore, after due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Recurrent Stress Fracture Left Lateral Malleolus Condition
 5262 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120626, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





xx
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 19 Aug 13

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their respective forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USN


                                                      xx
                                                     Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00912

    Original file (PD-2012-00912.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, i.e. depression and PTSD, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. At TDRL exit,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00872

    Original file (PD2012-00872.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. RATING COMPARISON: ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System fitness determinations and rating decisions for Service IPEB – Dated 20011012 Condition Pain and Loss Motion Left Ankle...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00064

    Original file (PD 2014 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board will consider the Category II condition as stated above, in its review of the unfitting right knee condition. Right Knee Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01677

    Original file (PD2012 01677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “left ankle trimalleolar fracture”as unfitting, rated 20%.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on severity at the time of separation. All members agreed that the C&P examination...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00695

    Original file (PD2012 00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “multiple stress reactions/healing stress fractures”as unfitting rated20%,with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions,left cuboid stress fracture, bilateral medial tibial plateau stress fracture and right femoral shaft stress fracture, were determined to be Category II (contributing to unfit condition). Bone scan on 22 August 2001 demonstrated healing stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01144

    Original file (PD2012 01144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “s/p left ankle bimalleolar fracture” as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). I believe that the Decision Board didn't take in consideration all the medical evidence in my favor thus making an erroneous decision; in this case: "when the disability was likely to have occurred or was aggravated, rather than make the assumption it occurred when the claim was originally filed, in addition this is a "faulty...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00678

    Original file (PD-2012-00678.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic right lower extremity pain as requested for consideration meets the Chronic Right Lower Extremity Pain 5299‐5262 20% ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 20% Condition Status Post Right Distal Tibia and Fibula Fracture Medial Right Leg Scar Lateral Right Leg Scar Right Ankle Scars Left Hip Iliotibial Band Syndrome Code 5262 8627‐7804 7804 7804 5099‐5024 Combined: 20% Rating 0%* 10% 0% 0% 10% Exam 20030414 20030414 20030414 20030414 20030414 criteria prescribed in DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01539

    Original file (PD2013 01539.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI non-concurred and the Reconsideration PEB only adjudicated the “posttraumatic arthritis, right ankle…” as unfitting, rated 10%, identifying all other conditions as not unfitting. Right Ankle Condition . Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01148

    Original file (PD2012 01148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The orthopedic evaluations on 18 November 2002 and 12 December 2002 recommended MEB, stating the ankle instabilityhad persisted despite repeated surgery, and that he had “worsening ankle pain due to physical activity,” and was unable to run, hike, march, or to perform his required duties.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination dated 21 March 2003 recorded “bilateral ankle with tenderness to palpation along lateral and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00320

    Original file (PD-2014-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Tibia/Fibula Stress Fractures...5099-50030%RPPS Left Knee; Stress Fracture Left Tibia and Fibula525710%20050728Bilateral Retropatellar Pain Syndrome (RPPS) Not UnfittingRPPS Right Knee; Stress Fracture Right Tibia 525710%No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in ScopeNo Other VA Conditions in Scope Combined: 0%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050928 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :Almost all analogous VASRD coding and rating...